(1) Word.
Webster
KJV
To be ...These Bibles or ...
... Completed... Maybe you pick two (KJV vs Young's Literal) if logged in
Noah Webster's 1828 American Dictionary
|
It is not only important, but, in a degree necessary, that the people of this country, should have an American Dictionary of the English language; for, although the body of the language is the same as in England, and it is desirable to perpetuate that sameness, yet some differences must exist. Language is the expression of ideas; and if the people of one country cannot preserve an identity of ideas, they cannot retain an identity of language. |
(1) Word.To be ...... Completed
1828 Definition
AT'LAS, n.
1913 Definition
One who sustains a great burden.
The first vertebra of the neck,
articulating immediately with the skull, thus sustaining the globe of the
head, whence the name.
A collection of maps in a volume
; --
supposed to be so called from a picture of Atlas supporting the world,
prefixed to some collections. This name is said to have been first used by
Mercator, the celebrated geographer, in the 16th century. A volume of plates illustrating any
subject.
A work in which subjects are exhibited in a
tabular from or arrangement; as, an historical atlas.
A large, square folio, resembling a volume of
maps; -- called also atlas folio.
A drawing paper of large size. See under
Paper,
Atlas powder, a nitroglycerin blasting compound of pasty consistency and great explosive power. A rich kind of
satin manufactured in India.
Brande *** C. | ||||||||
When approached with this legal assertion, as a patent counselor for your client, you need insights to help you define and determine your defense. No, I am not: A patent is defined by its language, and many times, proper preparation for a Markman Hearing, or Claim Construction Hearing, can determine the summary judgment. If you are accused of infringing on a claim, you want to find ways to minimize the scope of the claim [on the other hand, if you are accusing, you want to broaden a claim's scope]. With IP Street, you can scrutinize a claim in various ways. Your patent is invalid: Since the USPTO granted the patent, the presumption is that all of its claims are valid. Anyone can challenge the validity of a patent (request re-examination) whether or not an infringement injunction has been made. [Normally, when the USPTO learns of an infringement lawsuit, out of due diligence, they open a re-examination case.] The quickest path to invalidate a patent is to identify prior art.
