(3) Words.
Words
Definitions
(3) Words.
Webster
KJV
To be ...These Bibles or ...
... Completed... Maybe you pick two (KJV vs Young's Literal) if logged in
Noah Webster's 1828 American Dictionary
|
It is not only important, but, in a degree necessary, that the people of this country, should have an American Dictionary of the English language; for, although the body of the language is the same as in England, and it is desirable to perpetuate that sameness, yet some differences must exist. Language is the expression of ideas; and if the people of one country cannot preserve an identity of ideas, they cannot retain an identity of language. |
(3) Words.(3) Words.To be ...... Completed
1828 Definition
EXPLIC'IT, a. [L. explicitus, part of explico, to unfold.]
1913 Definition
A word formerly used (as
finis is now) at the conclusion of a book to indicate the
end.
Not implied merely, or conveyed by
implication; distinctly stated; plain in language; open to the
understanding; clear; not obscure or ambiguous; express; unequivocal;
as, an explicit declaration.
The language of the charter was too explicit to admit of a doubt. Bancroft. Having no disguised meaning or
reservation; unreserved; outspoken; -- applied to persons; as, he was
earnest and explicit in his statement.
Explicit function. (Math.) See under Function. Syn. -- Express; clear; plain; open; unreserved; unambiguous. -- Explicit, Express. Explicit denotes a setting forth in the plainest language, so that the meaning can not be misunderstood; as, an explicit promise. Express is stronger than explicit: it adds force to clearness. An express promise or engagement is not only unambiguous, but stands out in bold relief, with the most binding hold on the conscience. An explicit statement; a clear and explicit notion; explicit direction; no words can be more explicit. An explicit command; an express prohibition. "An express declaration goes forcibly and directly to the point. An explicit declaration leaves nothing ambiguous." C. J. Smith. | ||||||||
Executives need vision to convert patented R&D into a profit center. Consider EMI, a london company that produces music (a music label company). In their Central Research Laboratories in Hayes, Godfrey Hounsfield had an idea to integrate X-ray slices to create a 3-D image (originally known as an EMI scan), today know as a CT or CAT scan. Godfrey was awared a Nobel Prize for his work, and later knighted. The idea came to him while picnicking in the park; however, the senior executives realized this was no picnic. They leveraged the technology (foundation patent #3,778,614), securing over 120 of the first 450 patents in this space. The legacy competitors (General Electric, Philips, Siemens) were playing catch-up with this innovator. Few executives would be brave enough to execute such a divergent business strategy.
