(3) Words.
Webster
KJV
To be ...These Bibles or ...
... Completed... Maybe you pick two (KJV vs Young's Literal) if logged in
Noah Webster's 1828 American Dictionary
|
It is not only important, but, in a degree necessary, that the people of this country, should have an American Dictionary of the English language; for, although the body of the language is the same as in England, and it is desirable to perpetuate that sameness, yet some differences must exist. Language is the expression of ideas; and if the people of one country cannot preserve an identity of ideas, they cannot retain an identity of language. |
(3) Words.To be ...... Completed
1828 Definition
INDI'TE, v.t. [L. indico, indictum; in and dico, to speak.]
INDI'TE, v.i. To compose an account of.
[This is from the same original as indict. The different applications of the word have induced authors to express each in a different orthography, but without good reason.]
1913 Definition
To compose; to write; to be author of; to
dictate; to prompt.
My heart is inditing a good matter. Ps. xlv. 1. Could a common grief have indited such expressions? South. Hear how learned Greece her useful rules indites. Pope. To invite or ask.
[Obs.]
She will indite him to some supper. Shak. To indict; to accuse; to censure.
[Obs.] Spenser. To compose; to
write, as a poem.
Wounded I sing, tormented I indite. Herbert. | ||||||||
Noah Says...
The brief exposition of the constitution of the United States, will unfold to young persons the principles of republican government; and it is the sincere desire of the writer that our citizens should early understand that the genuine source of correct republican principles is the Bible, particularly the New Testament or the Christian religion.
History of the United States :: 1832
Patent data is publicly available, serves as a instrument for doing patent-level and firm-level analysis for both private and public firms, and amidst the modern information age, may be the only way to secure intellectual property. Patent counts or forward-citation counts have been traditionally used to measure the innovation portfolio of a firm. Using network analysis, a variation of Google's PageRank algorithm is introduced to the patent citation network to define an objective measure for radical innovation -- ``Patent Rank". Two model types are considered: simple structure and technology ``class-match" using two temporal forms: cumulative network and five-year moving window. All utility patents from 1976--2009 will be analyzed; over 5.6 million patents and 40 million citations are evaluated to produce 332 million Patent Rank scores. Useful distributional properties are considered and these objective scores are compared to a recent subjective survey performed by PBS to assess the question: What are the most radical innovations of the modern era?
